/ › Blog › Personal and work systems: how do they interact?
    Products · Sign in

    On this page

    • Personal and work systems: how do they interact?
      • I split my systems

    Info

    • Author: Johnny
    • Date: 2025-09-12
    • Link: jdcm.al/blog/0132

    Community

    • Forum
    • Discord (join server)

    Get organised today

    We spent hundreds of hours designing the perfect system, so you don't have to. Just download it and move in.

    Life Admin System

    Personal and work systems: how do they interact?

    This is a common question that I just received by email. The author has a personal and a work system – let's say they're Life Admin and Small Business, but that isn't important – and wants to know how the two should interact.

    The key question is whether these systems should be merged and/or interact in some way, or if they should remain divided. For example should you move Life Admin's 10-19 under your business system and re-number it? Should these systems share a JDex?

    (An assumption is that they're on the same computer, like they are for me. I don't have a separate work machine; if you do, this is simpler.)

    I split my systems

    I have P76 Johnny's personal life and D25 Johnny.Decimal. To each, it is like the other does not exist.

    They're different parts of my life and I find the separation helpful. Also, for example, I share the business with Lucy, but not my personal stuff. As soon as you merge them, you lose the ability to do that sort of thing.

    I keep my personal JDex in Bear and work in Obsidian. Again, because Obsidian is shared and Bear can't do that. This works for me: when I'm 'at work', I'm at work. It's rare that I find myself wishing I could, say, link a note from my work system over to my personal system.

    And when this does happen, I just use the full SYS.AC.ID identifier to tell myself this is what I mean. It just happened this morning: in a note in Obsidian I wanted to refer to a personal thing so I just typed out 'blah blah P76.15.54 blah blah' and that's all I need.

    No renaming necessary

    Our emailer had asked whether it was necessary to rename any of the systems' subfolders to indicate the system that they belong to.

    No. I have two top-level folders which mirror the system names, then the folder structure underneath is as-downloaded from JDHQ. No renaming of folders.

    I do name files

    I find it useful to name files with SYS.AC.ID at the start. This takes no extra time and now I can quickly see to which system they belong.


    ā—€ Back Your computer is your w… Extend-the-end: a deep-… Next ā–¶ (Use the ← arrow keys →)

    Learn

    • Documentation
    • Blog
    • Search

    About

    • About us
    • Policies
    • Sitemap

    Support

    • Contact
    • Support
    • Community