# Why wouldn't every meeting have an ID?

> Now there's no doubt what it's about and where the actions and minutes are.

After our [meeting on Monday](/blog/0199/) I'm feeling hyper-organised. All of our active work has a project in Things, which I'll show another day. What I'm doing now is scheduling some of this work, including a meeting with Lucy tomorrow.

For that meeting I've created a work package – again, details to follow – but what's interesting here is that I've used the IDs of all of these things _in the appointment title_.

<JDImage
  folder="blog"
  src="0203-fantastical-light-770x1270@2x.png"
  alt="Screenshot of 2 days from my calendar. A handful of meetings are shown, each of which starts with an ID like the one I mention in the text below."
  width={385}
  height={635}
/>

I don't see a reason why every single one of my future meetings won't have an ID. (Unless it's just me blocking time/reminding myself to stand up and have a break – see that work/break pair, which I move around throughout the day.)

Right now, in the context of setting up this meeting, I know what it's about. I _just_ created work package `W0159~21.39 Home page re-jiggering to make it more SBS-focused`. It's in-memory, as we say. So why let it fall _out_ of memory, only to have to recall it tomorrow?

It's these tiny optimisations, applied consistently, that'll make you 1% more efficient.